Instructions for Generating PDF for Submittal

Click the “Save” button below. When the print dialog appears, make sure to select “Print to PDF” from the “Destination” dropdown. When you continue to print, you will be able to choose a location on your computer to save the file.


Save

OM – Guidance on Measuring Organizational Efficiency at State Departments of Transportation

Funding

$350,000

Research Period


Background Information

State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) play a critical role in the management, maintenance, and development of each state’s transportation systems. Agencies are responsible for allocating billions of dollars in public funds, ensuring that transportation networks are safe, reliable, and sustainable. However, as transportation demands increase and budgets become more constrained, there is growing pressure on state DOTs to operate with maximum efficiency while maintaining high standards of service delivery.

Organizational efficiency at state DOTs is a key factor in ensuring that dollars are used effectively and that transportation projects are completed on time and within budget. Efficiency in this context refers to an agency’s ability to optimize resources—both human and financial—to deliver transportation services in a manner that reduces waste, streamlines processes, and achieves desired outcomes. Despite its importance, measuring organizational efficiency at state DOTs remains a complex and multifaceted challenge.

Current efforts to assess organizational efficiency in transportation agencies are often limited by inconsistent metrics, varying definitions of efficiency, and a lack of standardized methodologies for evaluation. While many state DOTs track performance indicators related to project delivery, budget adherence, and staff productivity, these measures often fail to provide a comprehensive view of overall organizational efficiency. Traditional efficiency metrics may not fully capture the complexities of modern transportation agencies, which must balance competing priorities such as mobility, safety, infrastructure maintenance, sustainability, innovation, and equity.

This research aims to develop a standardized framework for measuring organizational efficiency at state DOTs. By providing clear guidance and best practices, this research will empower transportation agencies to assess their internal processes, identify areas for improvement, and enhance their operational performance. The proposed framework will also align with broader state and federal goals, ensuring that transportation agencies can demonstrate accountability, improve project outcomes, and better manage resources.

Additionally, the research will examine how emerging technologies, such as data analytics, automation, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and digital project management tools, can improve efficiency measurement and foster a culture of continuous improvement. The guidance will also address how state DOTs can incorporate efficiency measures related to sustainability and equity, which are increasingly important components of transportation planning and service delivery.

This research will provide state DOTs with the tools they need to measure and enhance organizational efficiency, resulting in more effective transportation systems that meet the needs of the public and align with long-term strategic goals.


Literature Search Summary

The measurement of organizational efficiency at State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) is a growing area of interest. There has not been significant research in transportation agency organizational efficiency. The following presents resources that are broadly applicable to any organization and resources that are related to transportation.

Guidance and Resources – Not Specific to Transportation

  • “The Lean Six Sigma Pocket Toolbook: A Quick Reference Guide to 100 Tools for Improving Quality and Speed” by Michael L. George, John Maxey, David Rowlands, and Mark Price (2004)
    • A widely-used guide that provides an overview of Lean and Six Sigma methodologies, offering tools that can improve efficiency and reduce waste in government agencies and other organizations.
  • “Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation” by James P. Womack and Daniel T. Jones (2003)
    • This book introduces Lean principles and illustrates how organizations, including public sector entities, can streamline operations and increase efficiency.
  • "The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement" by Eliyahu M. Goldratt (2004)
    • A seminal work in the field of organizational efficiency, focusing on the theory of constraints and how organizations can identify and overcome bottlenecks in their operations.
  • “Managing and Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: An Integrated Approach” by Theodore H. Poister (2014)
    • This book provides detailed strategies for developing performance measurement systems and aligning them with organizational goals in public and nonprofit settings.
  • “Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action” by Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton (1996)
    • Introduces the Balanced Scorecard, a popular framework for measuring organizational performance that goes beyond traditional financial metrics to include customer, internal processes, and learning and growth perspectives.
  • “Big Data in Practice: How 45 Successful Companies Used Big Data Analytics to Deliver Extraordinary Results” by Bernard Marr (2016)
    • Offers real-world examples of how organizations, including government agencies, can utilize big data to enhance efficiency, streamline operations, and make informed decisions.
  • “Public Performance & Management Review (Journal)” by Routledge (Ongoing)
    • This journal offers peer-reviewed articles on performance management, accountability, and organizational efficiency in the public sector.
  • “The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering” by Janet V. Denhardt and Robert B. Denhardt (2015)
    • A book that critiques the "New Public Management" model and promotes a more service-oriented approach to public administration, which also emphasizes efficiency in government services.

Guidance and Resources – Transportation-Related

  • NCHRP Report 708: A Guidebook for Sustainability Performance Measurement for Transportation Agencies (2012)
    • Outlines various ways to measure efficiency in relation to sustainability goals, providing a foundation for the integration of sustainability metrics into broader organizational efficiency frameworks.
  • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Performance Management Guidebook (2013)
    • Emphasizes the importance of linking organizational efficiency to specific performance metrics, such as project delivery times, cost adherence, and customer satisfaction. However, the guidebook also acknowledges the need for more comprehensive measures that capture internal operational efficiency beyond project outcomes.
  • NCHRP Report 706: Uses of Performance Measurement to Support Decision Making for State and Local Transportation Agencies (2012)
    • Offers detailed insights into how performance metrics, including financial and operational data, can be used to gauge organizational efficiency. This report highlights best practices from leading state DOTs but also points out inconsistencies in metric application and reporting across agencies.
  • Lean Deployment in State Transportation Agencies: A Synthesis of Practices (NCHRP Synthesis 533, 2020)
    • Documents the application of lean principles in state DOTs, including case studies from departments such as the Ohio DOT and Arizona DOT, which have implemented lean initiatives to reduce bottlenecks, improve project delivery times, and increase productivity.
  • FHWA’s Office of Innovative Program Delivery
    • Published several reports on process improvement strategies, such as Value Engineering and Process Mapping, which help DOTs streamline operations and achieve cost savings. These techniques are often associated with greater organizational efficiency, though they are typically applied in specific project areas rather than as part of a broader agency-wide efficiency framework.
  • TRB Research Circular E-C227: Advancing Performance Management in Transportation (2017)
    • Highlights how state DOTs have faced difficulties in aligning organizational efficiency with broader state and federal goals, particularly in the context of constrained budgets and competing priorities.

Objectives

The objective of this research is to develop a comprehensive framework for measuring organizational efficiency at State Departments of Transportation (DOTs). This framework will provide standardized metrics and methodologies to assess and improve the internal processes, resource allocation, and overall performance of state DOTs. By identifying key areas for efficiency improvements and incorporating best practices from both public and private sectors, the research aims to empower transportation agencies to optimize operations, reduce waste, and enhance accountability. Additionally, the framework will address emerging considerations such as technology integration, sustainability, and equity, ensuring that DOTs are better equipped to meet the evolving demands of modern transportation systems while maximizing public value. In addition to the framework the research should produce tools to help state DOTs measure organizational efficiency.


Keywords/Terms


Link to 2021-2026 AASHTO Strategic Plan


Urgency and Potential Benefits

Urgency:

State Departments of Transportation (DOTs) are facing unprecedented challenges, including aging infrastructure, budget constraints, increasing public demand for accountability, and the growing need to incorporate sustainability and equity into their operations. With limited resources, it is essential that state DOTs operate with maximum efficiency to ensure public funds are used effectively and that transportation projects are completed on time and within budget. Despite the importance of organizational efficiency, many state DOTs lack a standardized framework for measuring internal performance, leading to inconsistent practices and missed opportunities for improvement. As the complexity of transportation networks increases, compounded by the demands of advanced technology, climate adaptation, and equity, there is an urgent need for a robust and adaptable framework to guide DOTs in optimizing their operations.

Potential Benefits:

The development of a comprehensive framework for measuring organizational efficiency at state DOTs will offer numerous benefits, including:

  1. Optimized Resource Allocation: By identifying areas of inefficiency, DOTs can better allocate their human, financial, and technological resources, leading to cost savings and more streamlined operations.
  2. Improved Project Delivery: A standardized efficiency measurement system will enable DOTs to improve project management processes, reducing delays and ensuring transportation projects are completed on schedule and within budget.
  3. Enhanced Accountability and Transparency: Implementing clear, measurable efficiency metrics will enable DOTs to demonstrate improved performance and accountability to the public, stakeholders, and funding agencies.
  4. Alignment with Strategic Goals: The framework will allow DOTs to align their operational efficiency with broader state and federal priorities, such as sustainability, equity, and resilience, ensuring that they meet modern transportation challenges.
  5. Technology Integration: By incorporating data analytics and automation into the efficiency framework, state DOTs will be better equipped to leverage emerging technologies for real-time decision-making and performance monitoring.
  6. Long-Term Sustainability and Equity: With sustainability and equity becoming core concerns in transportation planning, the framework will include measures to ensure that efficiency gains also promote environmental sustainability and equitable access to transportation services.

By addressing these urgent needs, this research will provide state DOTs with the tools to enhance operational efficiency, ensure effective use of public resources, and adapt to the evolving demands of transportation systems in the 21st century.


Implementation Considerations


Author(s)

Please add at least one champion.

Others Supporting Problem Statement

Please add at least one supporting organization.

Potential Panel Members

Please add at least one potential panel member.

Person Submitting Statement

Please add information about the person submitting the statement.

Notes